Phanera Gnosis.Problem-solving tools
ToolsWorld map
Research prototype · Rights-to-Form Conformance Testing

Crash-test an administrative form against its own rules.

Describe the governing rule, create a synthetic applicant, record what the form can actually express, and generate a reproducible counterexample when a lawful route appears to vanish.

1. Source-linked rule→2. Synthetic case→3. Form observation→4. Counterexample
01

Define the legal expectation

Encode only what a qualified human reviewer can defend from an authoritative source.

02

Build a synthetic applicant

Use invented facts only. Do not enter real claimant data.

03

Record the deployed form

This prototype records manual observations. It does not visit, automate, or submit the public form.

Capabilities the form must preserve

Mark each capability as available, unavailable, unclear, or not tested.

Available Unavailable Unclear

Run the conformance test

The result is deliberately asymmetric: it may identify a concrete mismatch, but a pass never proves that the whole service is lawful.

Why this instrument exists

A rule may admit an exceptional case while the form supplies only ordinary categories. The administrative right then survives on paper but disappears at the interface. This tool makes that loss visible as a source-linked, reproducible test.

Falsifying, not certifyingOne concrete failure can matter. A pass covers only the tested expectations.
Synthetic by designNo claimant database, personal identifiers, or real evidence documents are needed.
Clause-level provenanceEvery expectation should point back to the exact source and interpretation.